Fundamental Rights- Detailed Analysis

History of Fundamental Rights-

According to Locke, man is born “with a title to perfect freedom and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the Law of Nature” and he has by nature of power “to preserve his property – that is, his life, liberty and estate, against the injuries and attempts of other men”.

Origin of Modern Fundamental Rights-

The origin of modern Fundamental Rights can be traced back to the Constitution of the USA (Drafted in 1787). It was the first State which guarantee Fundamental Rights to its citizens and the source was the Constitution. Those were not only guaranteed but were made justifiable and enforceable through the courts. It means that the Fundamental Right was not only guaranteed but it was protected also through the instrumentality of the court of Law.

The original US Constitution did not have any provision for Fundamental Rights. And for this reason, it was facing very much criticism. Consequently, the Bill of Rights (1791) was incorporated with ten amendments to the US Constitution. It protects the life, liberty, and property of its citizens.

People’s basic rights were given a more concrete and universal touch by the Charter of Human Rights (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948) which was enacted by the United Nations Organisation (UNO) and the European Convention on Human Rights (European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950).

The Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) declares that “Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.

Do We Need Fundamental Rights?

Scope and object of Fundamental Rights-

The attempt of the court should be to expand the reach and ambit of the Fundamental Rights rather than to attenuate their meaning and content by a process of judicial construction (Menika Gandhi vs. Union of India, 1978, SC).

The object of Fundamental Rights under the Indian Constitution has been to place the citizens at centre stage and make the State accountable (People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs Union of India, 2005, SC).

Against whom Fundamental Rights can be claimed? –

Article 12- Definition.—In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires, “the State” includes the Government and Parliament of India and the Government and the Legislature of each of the States and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.

Protection of the Fundamental Rights-

The Courts that is the Supreme Court and the High Courts act as the protector and guardian of these rights. Courts also act as the interpreter of the Fundamental Rights. The Courts have shown a very liberal, creative, and descriptive approach in the interpretation of the Fundamental Rights.

The Fundamental Rights are intended not only to protect individual’s rights but they are based on high public policy. Liberty of the individual and protection of his Fundamental Rights are the very essence of the democratic way of life adopted by the Constitution, and it is the privilege and duty of this Court to uphold those rights. This court would naturally refuse to circumscribe them or to curtail them except as provided by the constitution itself (Daryao vs.  State of Uttar Pradesh, 1961, SC).

Fundamental Rights under the Indian Constitution-

Fundamental Rights under the Constitution cannot be bartered away. They cannot be compromised nor can there be any estoppel against the exercise of Fundamental Rights available under the Constitution (Nar Singh Pal vs Union of India, 2000, SC).

1 thought on “Fundamental Rights- Detailed Analysis”

  1. Pingback: Acquittal of one and conviction of the other is not permissible if the evidence is similar- Supreme Court -

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top